it would be a central strategic failure if AI excluded biological weapons from its arsenal.
So capital is an artificial intelligence and, moreover, is already "much more intelligent" than humans? That seems like a strange statement from the POV of what is normally referred to as "artificial intelligence". Can u expand?
-
-
what's normally referred to as "artificial intelligence" is a good way to produce gadgets that crank capital forward.
-
I agree that current efforts in the field fall well short of artificial intelligence, and furthermore that they (thinking of trendy statistical-based learning in particular) are not likely to produce one.
-
they are producing better machine-parts for the true thing. i mean, capital without internet was pretty fearsome, but with it, it's a true monster. same for deep learning.
-
Okay, but in what sense is it an "artificial intelligence"?
-
it's artificial (produced through artifice/indirect process) it's an intelligence (self-enhancing process)
-
So in ur view, any social process that is "self-enhancing" qualifies as an "artificial intelligence"? What do you mean by "self-enhancing"?
-
any process (not necessarily social (as in dependent on human societies) that is self-enhancing is intelligent, by definition. not all are artificial (that depends on its being intermediates with other processes).
-
self-enhancement is producing more of itself, ever more locally - intensification, in a word.
- 29 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
shush, vimothy 'tsa matter of faithpic.twitter.com/Ke9TR1nLWT
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.