"... an awful question, if you think about it." -- Pearl-clutching intensifies.
-
-
Replying to @UF_blog
right on the identity question though, (sub)culture comes from messy inventive co-adaptation, hybridity (not hygienic self-sequestration)
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @urbanomicdotcom
Hybridity without free association is communist tyranny.
3 replies 3 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @UF_blog @urbanomicdotcom
... Everyone is actually selective (i.e. discriminating), even if they've been terrorized by religious fanatics out of admitting it.
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @UF_blog
that's true. But even Grandpa Badiou thinks it's worth the hassle. It depends whether you want an interesting world or a well-ordered one
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @urbanomicdotcom
"Interesting" like Somalia, versus "well-ordered" like Hong Kong? If that's the option, I'll take it.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @UF_blog @urbanomicdotcom
... Entropy -- including demographic entropy -- is by any sensible definition uninteresting. Maximize diversity.
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @UF_blog
cultural negentropy emerges, and always has, from miscegenation. Not from staying at home with yr internets and yr sexbot
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
...there are no opportunities for miscegenation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.