And hey, male genital mutilation is banned as it falls under child protection laws. Circumcision isn’t banned for the same reason a labiaplasty isn’t banned. They *should* be used to treat abnormalities that can damage someone’s health.
I needed a circumcision to save my life. True phimosis and constant infection. Can’t I at least attest to that? And where’s the part of FGM law that says that?
-
-
The FGM law does not outlaw therapeutic treatments to the genitals. Nobody supports a MGM bill that would outlaw therapeutic treatments either.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And that makes sense, and that's something we'd say the law should still allow, but that's the rare case. More than 70% of circumcision world wide is religious, almost all of the rest is cultural, less than 1% is therapeutic medicine.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.