It seems like every time you tell me to “go do a course on stats” you say something wrong. The only example of a “fatal flaw” in medical research is something that can’t be corrected with a later study, like studying the wrong variable (e.g. concluding that firemen cause fires).
“Is essentially zero” stop treating statistics like they’re the original numbers. The real number, as you stated, of men who require circumcision, is 42 million.
-
-
"the real number, as you stated, of men who require circumcision, is 42 million." I never stated that 42 million men need a circumcision.
-
“0.006% is the actual percentage of adult men wanting or needing a circumcision”
-
-
It’s really hard to have a fun conversation here. You’re not cool with killing 42 million but you’re fine with 210,000? And just my excuse, but it's 1 AM here.
-
Fallacy: strawman argument.
-
I no longer care for the next 12 hours
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.