No, you’re the one criticising two medical studies with evidence because they “disagree with you”. And saying they’re objectively wrong. If they are, find someone discrediting them, which would prove me wrong. It’s not like the burden of proof joke with the bible.
I forget who quoted me the “0.006% of all people suffering that bad of a UTI” stat. Wasn’t it you? And it isn’t fear-mongering, it’s just me mentioning the amount of people that would suffer if suddenly therapeutic male circumcision became illegal. Even 42,000 is still bad.
-
-
0.006% is the actual percentage of adult men wanting or needing a circumcision. i.e. your claims of "chronic infections" are bullshit. Not sure why this isn't sinking in, maybe caps lock, again, will help: NO ONE IS AGAINST THEREAPEUTIC CIRCUMCISION SO STOP VOMITING THAT OUT.
-
So the actual percentage of men needing circumcision for legitimate medical reasons (for example, chronic infection)
-
...is essentially zero.
-
“Is essentially zero” stop treating statistics like they’re the original numbers. The real number, as you stated, of men who require circumcision, is 42 million.
-
"the real number, as you stated, of men who require circumcision, is 42 million." I never stated that 42 million men need a circumcision.
-
“0.006% is the actual percentage of adult men wanting or needing a circumcision”
-
-
It’s really hard to have a fun conversation here. You’re not cool with killing 42 million but you’re fine with 210,000? And just my excuse, but it's 1 AM here.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.