Stop repeating that nobody here is suggesting that, I can quote Gregory saying he wants it totally banned multiple times. We, however, have no disagreement because we both don’t want it banned if medically necessary. I mean, I’d say you just don’t like me. How mean.
Why do you make it sound like they only urinate and defecate post-circumcision? What wonders it works. But seriously, they’re just as gross. And by the way, certain hospitals employ different systems to protect the wound. It’s not just sitting there getting septic.
-
-
"Why do you make it sound like they only urinate and defecate post-circumcision?" Do you seriously not understand that an intact child has a fused-to-the-glans foreskin to keep out such contaminants whereas a mutilated child has his meatus exposed as well as an open wound? Wow.
-
You’re just cutting parts out of my argument to make yours look better at this point. Forget the mention of antiseptic procedure and how nobody lets such an infection risk slide in a hospital?
-
Because this is a false statement. Infections in mutilated boys occur all the time, both in hospitals and outside of them.
-
All the time, huh? 2% of one study group is “all the time” to you? What’s the linear relationship of circumcision to infection? Is the correlation coefficient really above 0.9?
-
The true extent of the risks of circumcision are unknown, actually; another reason why forcing it on children is anathema.
-
If it’s been done for 15,000 years I think we might have a pretty broad scope of the risks by now.
-
Nope. Here are the risks: https://med.stanford.edu/newborns/professional-education/circumcision/complications.html … Do you see an incidence rate by any of them? Nope. Because we don't know.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.