You know what this makes me think of? When you’re having an actual debate in real life in a team, and the audience gets convinced you disagree with them too and joins in.
It’s not included in the medical or legal definition of female genital mutilation. At all, anywhere. It’s a legal surgery. You would be making things unequal by banning male circumcision. What about all the female babies, then? The dangers of labiaplasty? Intactivists for women?
-
-
"You would be making things unequal by banning male circumcision." No, we'd finally be making things equal. "What about all the female babies, then?" What about them? Cosmetic surgery on female genitalia is already a felony in most Western nations. Not true for boys'
-
If I chopped your dick in half as a kid, you think the government would let that slide?
-
This is a fallacy.
-
You can begin answering that by explaining how it was a relevant rejoinder.
-
Does chopping your dick in half for aesthetics count as mutilation or not
-
All medically unnecessary genital cutting is genital mutilation.
-
Yep. Sure, I agree.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.