I’m literally not here to argue with you, I was debating with Gregory. Stop dragging this out. I’ll say it again. We have never disagreed on male circumcision. You are having a non-argument that is bothering me, because I’m checking my phone and it’s just you calling me sexist.
-
-
So you agree then that boys and girls should have equal protection from genital cutting? Because last I saw you were falsely arguing that female cutting doesn't legitimately happen for health reasons and fallaciously arguing it's different than forced male genital cutting?
-
I said female *genital mutilation* doesn’t happen for medical reasons. Labiaplasty was never included. It’s exceptional, like male circumcision should be. Otherwise we’d be being sexist, wouldn’t we? Why would you want women getting surgery but not men?
-
As already explained to you, any form of cutting of female genitalia constitutes genital mutilation according to the WHO, including ceremonial pin pricks and including labiaplasties. The only difference is that in this case the labiaplasty was thereapeutic and therefore legal.
-
You shouldn’t have made me check. Labiaplasty doesn’t count. And by the way, once again, I disagree with non-therapeutic circumcision.pic.twitter.com/UOoil3vAXY
-
You literally just cited a definition demonstrating that non-therapeutic labiaplasties constitute FGM...
-
I thought we were talking about therapeutic labiaplasties? And therapeutic circumcision? So it’s totally relevant?
-
No! For the thirtieth time now, NO ONE HERE OPPOSES THERAPEUTIC SURGERY ON CHILDREN.
-
So why are you here then?
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.