A normal labia doesn’t cause constant urinary tract infections. That’s why.
You must have misunderstood. I said if they enforce circumcision like I’ve been saying they should (not often or for religious reasons, only when medically necessary) it would be a smaller number.
-
-
Regardless, 2 > 1, always
-
Not with percentages of different variables, clearly. Want to reword?
-
No need. I can't simplify it any further for you. Either you can get it or you can't.
-
Okay, clearly you need to take a step back and realise what you just said. I cannot understand broken maths. 2% of a small number should not be a bigger number than 1% of a far larger number.
-
It's simple: Circumcision causes more problems than it cures. Regardless of how many you do, you're always causing more harm than if you didn't.
-
If a man has recurring cancer in his shin at stage 3, do we cut it out or let it go to stage 4? If we give him a sore shin but save him from death, is it doing harm?
-
Another cool hypothetical. How about if it's a baby girl and it's her vulva? Chop it off, right?
-
You'd need to ask a lawyer.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.