Dude, if a doctor pressured you to do surgery and you had an issue with it take it up with the hospital. Your anecdote isn’t representative of the healthcare system.
-
-
There is no such thing as "medical" circumcision of healthy 8-day infants.
-
My dude, I disagree with religious circumcision. I’m showing a few situations where it’s required medically to argue against a blanket ban. We both agree.
-
No one ever argued for a blanket ban. No infant ever requires a circumcision.
-
Infants suffering from chronic infection should be circumcised to prevent further infection. That is valid. Gregory here is quoted asking for a blanket ban multiple times. He’s pretty much the only guy I disagree with. This is like having a debate and then the audience joins in.
-
"Infants suffering from chronic infection" Show me one
-
Dude, I gave you two studies. The one you complained about had a statistic in it specifically referring to infants suffering from chronic infection. That’s more than 1 example. That’s a group of examples.
-
Neither of those studies controlled for iatrogenic harm. They're garbage studies.
-
“They’re garbage studies” - a Twitter user. I guess they’re discredited. The number of infections that are iatrogenic in that number is so small that they make no difference. Prove me wrong.
- 22 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.