I gotta be totally frank here, you're talking outta your ass... You just learned preputioplasty exists moments ago but you already think you can declare which is more dangerous or harmful? How about you provide some evidence for a change? Circumcision cuts through veins too
No. Circumcision was recommended in your medical paper as being for recurring infection or where tissue scarring occurs.
-
-
These are the uses (excuses) that doctors have come up with for it in modern times. It's not the reason why it was originally prescribed in america, it's not the reason why it was prescribed in religion. Those were both about damaging sexual function:pic.twitter.com/SD11hqaBWR
-
Just imagine being one of these doctors when the sexual revolution of the past century hit. They made their careers on damaging kids sexually, and now suddenly that's a bad thing? They've been scrambling to justify it ever since, so people won't sue or try to get revenge or w/e
-
General surgeons do more than just circumcision, they don’t need to justify their practices to keep their job, you can’t suggest that circumcision is a religious practice because it was originally religious.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.