This thread is getting an aura of infohazardhttps://twitter.com/_StevenFan/status/1232575057458630657 …
-
Show this thread
-
Why are you all visiting this it's a clearly marked infohazard and just probably bad content. This is how pandoras box happens.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
Replying to @_StevenFan
How large is the effect risk tho? https://qualiacomputing.com/2019/08/30/why-care-about-meme-hazards-and-thoughts-on-how-to-handle-them/ …pic.twitter.com/F6qLCG6IFt
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
-
Replying to @f_j_j_
Response to threat or the idea of dangerous or forbidden information is high. People prob. Don't expect to actually encounter an infohazard yet respond relatively strongly to it in comparison to mild recommendations.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @_StevenFan @f_j_j_
I don't usually wield such energies though they are commonly wielded. Ive understood intellectually Threat (and heroic transcendence I recall) are the most likely things to go viral.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @_StevenFan @f_j_j_
In the case of threat, the emotions of panic, fear, and anger, as well as expectation are all at their highest valence. I don't know if humans have particular linguistic or tonal markers of threat with the exception of swearing.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @_StevenFan
intensity != valence tho and clearly, intonation can make seemingly innocuous utterances threatening. or maybe it's just my british accent idk. (jk but this is also a real thing, showing how narrowly culturally determined the signal is)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Yeah mixed up valence for arousal. Switched those for the correct reading. Oops.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


"Nasty little Buddhist"
Seeking via neuroscience and psychology informed dharma.