Reflecting on twitter etiquette SM, much easier to reply to something and deconstruct than to put yourself out there and construct; replying only without exposing your inner language and narrative is probably cowardly
there are communities out there with their levels of development, something like Wilbur or Kegan, or at least their own culture if you don't believe in that stuff. There aren't fixed boundaries but a graph analysis would tell you a bunch.
-
-
THE open question is how to socially and technologically specify rules of engagement between [tribes], assuming we want SM to be pro social, and less like a non-kinetic psyops war.
Show this thread -
[tribes] is what came to mind. Not the best frame because tribes to me implies arbitrariness, like a Starwars vs Startrek fan faceoff. The actual many faceted segments of society, organized around values, politics, institutions, etc... I don't have good abstractions for
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's easiest one on one to bring out deeper assumptions and values into opposition. I've done it online, but it takes a fair amount of explicit rapport building to not come of as critical, and it's still way harder. Compliment/shared meaning sandwich a great method for text.
Show this thread -
It's probably way harder because writing is a pretty heady exercise that I'm impatient with, unlike speech which resonates more with body and emotions.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


"Nasty little Buddhist"
Seeking via neuroscience and psychology informed dharma.