You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I respect your opinion. I think differently though. As a lesb I actually find the idea that only gay can play gay alienating, as if we were so extra different that only us could play us. I realise it's NOT what you mean though and, again, i respect your view as well
I took it as “if Superman happened to be gay in a Superman movie, cool. But if the focal point of the story is the character’s experience as a gay person, then I don’t want to take that away from someone who’s lived that” but obviously interpretation is subjective
I think that's the distinction he was making.
1/part of me agrees but another doesn't, here's why: A. I dont want a situation when an actor "owes" it to share publically what their sexuality is in order to claim legitimacy for their part. Nor do I want closeted actors to shy away from roles for this reason. B. I feel that ->
2/ the limit can be blurry between what consists of "a queer story" and a story when character "happens to be queer". Unless it's specifically a historical piece. To me for ex, Mullholand Drive is a beautiful piece about lesbian loneliness, now was it intended that way?Probably->
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
