Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @_HannahRitchie
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @_HannahRitchie
-
Just to be clear...when scientists say: “Meat has a pretty big carbon footprint, it might be good if rich countries ate less of it” they are not saying: “Everyone should only eat lettuce (which is basically flavoured water) for the rest of their lives”https://twitter.com/dmdent/status/1224786641530822661 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Hannah Ritchie proslijedio/la je Tweet
Japan's return to coal is a direct result of shutting down a large portion of the clean energy generation. https://twitter.com/jswatz/status/1224410237484093440 …pic.twitter.com/16wM7KqUpB
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
This is very cool! But the real test is whether it can handle my Scottish accent.https://twitter.com/edchi/status/1224561613736415232 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
In a follow-up article we look at how regional variations in footprints of foods affect this. The message remains the same: the ‘worst' plant-based foods are still much lower than the 'best' meat and dairy.https://twitter.com/_HannahRitchie/status/1224629024053436416 …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
But this is not about completely wiping out meat. Lower footprint meat still has a large role to play. The massive ranges we see for products such as beef and lamb mean we have options from both producers and consumers to make a difference.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
This is a follow-up to a common question raised from my previous article on the impact of food choice vs. eating local. Many argued that this ignored regional variations. But it holds true when we look past global averages.https://ourworldindata.org/food-choice-vs-eating-local …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Eating less meat is nearly always better for your carbon footprint than eating the 'most sustainable' meat. The ‘worst' peas, beans, tofu and nuts still have a lower footprint than the ‘best’ meat and dairy. Latest
@OurWorldInData article: https://ourworldindata.org/less-meat-or-sustainable-meat …pic.twitter.com/A5W5co0qXD
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
You can explore all of this in our
@OurWorldinData article on Natural Disasters: https://ourworldindata.org/natural-disasters … /endPrikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
EM-DAT (the disaster database) report that most heatwave deaths occurred in Europe. Mostly France, Belgium and the Netherlands.pic.twitter.com/F19u1MD0GZ
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
EM-DAT (the disaster database) report that most flood deaths occurred in Asia and Africa. Largest number were in India.pic.twitter.com/Zrx7cp91Jr
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
What were the deadliest types of disasters? Almost half of these deaths were in floods. Summer heatwaves also had an impact. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/number-of-deaths-from-natural-disasters?time=2019&country=Drought+Earthquake+Extreme%20temperature+Extreme%20weather+Flood+Wildfire+Landslide+Volcanic%20activity …pic.twitter.com/uacmFuFi1z
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
When we look over longer timescales (since 1900), deaths from natural disasters have declined a lot. It was not uncommon for millions to die in a year. We can adapt & respond much better since we are richer. Have better technology/systems to do so. https://ourworldindata.org/natural-disasters#annual-deaths-from-natural-disasters …pic.twitter.com/zhymVXb6kB
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Just under 12,000 people (11,719) died from natural disasters in 2019. This was quite a low mortality year – mainly because there were no massive earthquakes. Average over the past decade is approx. 60,000 per year: https://ourworldindata.org/natural-disasters#natural-disasters-kill-on-average-60-000-people-per-year-and-are-responsible-for-0-1-of-global-deaths …pic.twitter.com/nqaOtnirPZ
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
How many people died from natural disasters in 2019? Just updated our
@OurWorldInData work on Natural Disasters with the final figures from EMDAT. https://ourworldindata.org/natural-disasters … A short thread 1/pic.twitter.com/CNiEj5E4Gi
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Hannah Ritchie proslijedio/la je Tweet
For tomorrow’s
#WorldCancerDay
I ask whether the world is making progress against cancer.
Deaths from cancer increased.
Mostly because of population growth; the rate increased only a quarter as much.
Adjusted for aging the death rate declined.https://ourworldindata.org/progress-against-cancer …Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Hannah Ritchie proslijedio/la je Tweet
We would die from starvation. It’s that simple.https://twitter.com/philip_ciwf/status/1223866211546648576 …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Hannah Ritchie proslijedio/la je Tweet
Nature just published a comment by
@Peters_Glen and I pointing out that the high-emissions RCP8.5 emissions scenario – with its 500% increase in coal use by 2100 – is increasingly unlikely in a world of falling clean energy prices. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00177-3 … A thread: 1/11pic.twitter.com/Z9nJR12JWo
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Actually identifying which foods are air-freighted can be hard. Often they’re not labeled. I think they should be. Usually it's highly-perishable foods, transported a long way = they have to get to the consumer quickly, so come by plane. /end
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Since most food isn’t transported by plane, ‘eating local’ has a much smaller impact on our footprint than we often think. But it *does* matter for the small amount of air-freighted food. We should avoid that where we can. 3/
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
This matters. Whether your food travels by boat or plane has a large difference on it’s carbon footprint. Transporting by plane emits around 50 times as much CO₂ per tonne-kilometer vs. by boat. 2/
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.