Charlie Corbett

@_CharlieCorbett

UCLA Law fellow working on environmental law and geoengineering governance. Harvard Law JD 2019. All takes my own 🌈

Los Angeles / Baltimore
Vrijeme pridruživanja: siječanj 2020.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @_CharlieCorbett

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @_CharlieCorbett

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    3. velj

    I couldn't stop thinking about Juliana, the Flint Water Crisis, and environmental protection under the Constitution, so I wrote an essay about it. Going to post a new piece about once a week. Always taking suggestions

    Poništi
  2. Great reporting here on pig nuisance law, general skulduggery in waste management w/in industrial livestock operations. Also pleased Judge Wilkinson at argument seemed receptive to the environmental justice dimensions here

    Poništi
  3. Poništi
  4. 2. velj

    here's a case comment on Knick v. Township of Scott from the Harvard Law Review, for the curious + the foolhardy, but I'm realizing it might not make much sense to a non-legal reader if anyone wants help on the mysteries of federal jurisdiction, lmk

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. 2. velj

    I was reading Erwin Chemrinsky on § 1983 actions last night (yes, I am a big dork), and I couldn't help but think of Knick v. Township of Scott, Penn., decided last term. I seriously doubt the Reconstruction Congress was concerned about regulatory takings but here we are.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 31. sij

    Anyway, , , et al., my line is open if you want to talk! I spent my MLK weekend “dialoguing” w/ ecosocialist friends in NYC re: geoengineering ... I can take the critique 🙂

    Poništi
  7. 31. sij

    Very weird reading this essay minutes after hearing about the Green party voting with the Center and Far Right in Baden-Würrtemberg against protecting refugees from deportation , what gives with the green-black coalition?

    Poništi
  8. 30. sij

    First time hearing about the RCP8.5 hullabaloo, so I found this piece helpful. I can imagine being ... less enthused if its your 5th or 6th trip round the mulberry bush. The climate change associated w/ more likely emission pathways is staggering, tho. As is the uncertainty

    Poništi
  9. 28. sij

    The facts from the Flint Water Crisis are appalling. (From Guertin v. Michigan, 912 F.3d 907, 915 (6th Cir. 2019))

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 28. sij
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 27. sij

    I really like the geoengineering/Medicine analogy, until I remember what early medical science looked like. Then I no longer like the analogy.

    Poništi
  12. 27. sij

    my latest and much-too-long blogpost on artificial ocean alkalinization, a potential tool for climate adaptation and carbon removal

    Poništi
  13. 27. sij

    Trying to understand my sci-fi job by reading more sci-fi . . . This one was pretty OK! The exposition/lore was great, but the plot was meh & a lot of missed opps. re: colonialism in the Pacific. Going to read something more contemporary next. Send reccs!

    Poništi
  14. 25. sij

    this animated globe from NOAA showing real-time wind speed, ocean currents, and temps is so cool

    Poništi
  15. 25. sij

    fwiw, here's Becky Hammer from NRDC (also quoted in the NYT piece), placing these raw sewage floods w/in the bigger climate picture, and calling for more federal infrastructure funding to upgrade these systems

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 25. sij

    "Washington alone expects to spend $2.7 billion on three tunnels and related infrastructure, funded through higher water bills " Do most cities fund these upgrades with regressive tax/cost-of-service increases? Is there a fairer way to fund this?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 24. sij

    "For something as controversial and dangerous as solar geoengineering, we have to get the governance right." on the recent $4M appropriation to NOAA to conduct solar geoengineering research

    Poništi
  18. 24. sij
    Poništi
  19. 24. sij

    But that outcome/relief is “unacceptable” (politically? philosophically? constitutionally? Take your pick), so the case dies bc of redressability without needing to determine if the substantive DP right exists.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 24. sij

    Like, courts definitely have the institutional competence to enjoin subsidies of fossil fuels, and that order would have provided meaningful relief to plaintiffs' injury, if they wanted to recognize and enforce a due process right to a stable climate.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·