body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2022 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

NEW: Lawsuit filed tonight in DC federal court on behalf of migrants who say they're traveling to the United States to seek asylum, alleging the Trump admin is unconstitutionally detaining asylum seekers and trying to deny them entry assets.documentcloud.org/documents/5026

63

422

574

This lawsuit is forward-looking — it defines the class of people who would be covered by it as asylum seekers who are traveling to the US or who have tried to enter the US since Oct. 31 (which was yesterday)

2:49 AM · Nov 2, 2018

Replying to

The lawsuit claims a few things: 1) That Trump and other officials saying they won't let the caravan in means they're going to deny people the right to seek asylum 2) That the admin has a policy of mandatory detention for asylum seekers w/out a chance to challenge designation

19

72

112

@JonathanAEvers

Replying to

So, you DO understand that "forward looking" lawsuits aren't a thing, right? You must be "damaged" in order to bring suit against another party. It's called "standing". ¯\_(ツ)_/¯#LiberalLogic

Replying to

Cool they can simply be told that, they refused asylum in Mexico therefore the are not eligible for asylum in the US.

Replying to

Its frivolous, to allow it would put ALL the WORLD under our bill of rights, the scotus has ruled Foreign have NO DUE PROCESS if Outside the USA!

Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content

Show