Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Conversations about how contingent/independent scholars can keep publishing need to reckon with the oft-unspoken question: why bother? What’s the incentive? I think back to this exchange a lot. This relationship Grossman evokes is basically a one-way street. 1/pic.twitter.com/iWi83qEDbQ
To be clear, I like the idea of continuing to publish. But one of the first things I heard from another academic when I got my current job was that “You can use your PTO for research trips!” There wasn’t even a segue: it was immediately back to how I can give more to academia. 2/
More scholarly production doesn’t save contingent scholars from adjunctopia, so we need a reason beyond that, and academic research cannot solely be a hobby sustained by an individual, because frankly, it’s shitty on those terms. Scholarly societies need to figure this out. 3/
All of this is on my mind because I’m supposed to be speaking at a career diversity panel in a few days, and I’m finding it hard to articulate what can really be done. I have lots of ideas about how orgs can stop actively obstructing their own members, but beyond that... 4/
I’m at a loss. It’s hard to defend continuing engagement in these networks except for people who just really like it, which basically leaves it to the well-off? 5/
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
