not saying that at all. yes, Nintendo has a right and a responsibility to protect their IP. But wonky fan tributes to Mario 64 don’t warrant a fucking C&D. these are fans, artists, and kids trying to learn how to make games using something they know and love as a stepping stone.https://twitter.com/sasslion/status/1241745855821967362 …
-
-
Oh, come on. The model shown in IGN's article was not created by a beginner or a kid. It's an artist trying to grow their streaming channel by capitalizing on a high-profile IP. The artist clearly knew they were infringing. A kid would be happy using a knockoff Murray-O model.
-
How is creating a carbon-copy of Mario to generate views on a Twitch or any other social media platform different from other forms of plagiarism or intellectual theft?
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
I don’t necessarily disagree with you,
@ZachariusD, but could it be that a. these materials could be monetized, and b. if they don’t enforce their IP consistently they can lose certain aspects of defensibility later? Could active protection be a legal requirement to keep an IP?Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.