Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?
    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
ZachG932's profile
Zach Goldberg
Zach Goldberg
Zach Goldberg
@ZachG932

Tweets

Zach Goldberg

@ZachG932

PhD student/Wokeness Studies scholar/@CSPICenterOrg fellow researching the 'Great Awokening'

Joined February 2014

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list

    Under 100 characters, optional
    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

      @C_Kavanagh You asked for RW-related terms. Here's one.

      8 replies 17 retweets 175 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

      As some of you pointed out, any search term is likely to see an overtime increase (if only due to growth in the number of news outlets/publications). As such, I think it's better to limit the searches to single publications. So here's the trend for 'PC' in the NYTpic.twitter.com/GJhdpppi3T

      13 replies 78 retweets 437 likes
      Show this thread
    3. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

      And here's the number of NYT articles mentioning 'diversity'pic.twitter.com/4mjOOrcebK

      9 replies 87 retweets 461 likes
      Show this thread
    4. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

      Original NYT Racism graph was actually an undercount. The search was generated with racism in quotations (and quotations should only be used when connecting two words). Here's the corrected figure. Let me see if other graphs are similarly affected.pic.twitter.com/9C26W12ock

      15 replies 100 retweets 509 likes
      Show this thread
    5. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

      The 'privilege' NYT graph was also an undercount. Obviously, the word 'privilege' need not refer to social/racial privilege. I nevertheless find it interesting that its use has grown tremendously over the past few years. It could be just a coincidence, but I'm skeptical.pic.twitter.com/AilEduyvAZ

      19 replies 66 retweets 394 likes
      Show this thread
    6. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 29 May 2019

      Update: Currently working on tallying the annual number of NYT articles between 1980-2018 so I can calculate percentages. The NYT doesn't make this information readily available so I have to 'cheat' by using noise words (e.g. 'the') as search terms.

      8 replies 23 retweets 250 likes
      Show this thread
    7. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 29 May 2019

      Update #2: Okay, I've finished one of them. Once again, using 'the' as a search term, I tabulated the number of results for NYT each year between 1980-2018. In the end, it seems that 'racism' mentions grew both in absolute terms *and* as a percent of all listed articles.pic.twitter.com/alCo8bZaXP

      25 replies 76 retweets 386 likes
      Show this thread
    8. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 29 May 2019

      For instance, for 2018, LexisNexis produces results for 113,596 articles--2.07% of which mentioned 'racism'

      51 replies 30 retweets 214 likes
      Show this thread
    9. This Tweet is unavailable.
    10. DevlinSmedes‏ @DevlinSmedes 30 May 2019
      Replying to @ZachG932

      The chart for "privilege" indicates that 60% of NYT articles contained the word in 2018. That seems a bit implausible, so could you rerun the query and see if there was some mistake?

      2 replies 1 retweet 1 like
      Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 30 May 2019
      Replying to @DevlinSmedes

      You are correct (60% sounded crazy). It's a coding error Here's the corrected figure:pic.twitter.com/PjEwjFSHcV

      1:45 AM - 30 May 2019
      • 6 Retweets
      • 14 Likes
      • mr miagi François Wirion Trees Tops Evil Incarnate Peter Sheridan Dodds JC A Dangerous Chinese Bat 🌐 Frank Jean Lafitte
      4 replies 6 retweets 14 likes
        1. New conversation
        1. DevlinSmedes‏ @DevlinSmedes 30 May 2019
          Replying to @ZachG932

          Thanks. However, there is still something strange going on. "privilege" has 40k total mentions and hovers between 0.0075% and 0.025%. But "toaster" has only 2434 mentions and yet somehow the percentages are consistently higher: between 0.05 and 0.09.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        2. Violet Broregarde‏ @broregarde 30 May 2019
          Replying to @DevlinSmedes @ZachG932

          Can you release the code you're using to do this?

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          3. End of conversation
        2. New conversation
        1. David Rozado‏ @DavidRozado 30 May 2019
          Replying to @ZachG932 @DevlinSmedes

          @ZachG932 Hello Zach. I've been working on this topic lately. The next figure summarizes the trendpic.twitter.com/fMd88RIqT7

          4 replies 36 retweets 90 likes
        2. This Tweet is unavailable.
        3. Show replies
        1. _mzishi_‏ @_mzishi_ 30 May 2019
          Replying to @ZachG932 @DevlinSmedes

          Can you try the term "Collusion" and "Impeachment"? Want to see if "Impeachment" consistently trended across party-line with respect to Bush, Obama, and now Trump....

          0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 30 May 2019
          Replying to @ZachG932 @DevlinSmedes

          Argh...and this is why you don't make graphs at 2 in the morning. I forgot to multiply by 100. The data above are proportions. Here you have it in percentagespic.twitter.com/RigwxhrDJT

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info