Эта настройка позволяет добавлять в твиты информацию о местоположении, например название города и точные координаты, на веб-сайте и в сторонних приложениях. Вы можете удалить сведения о местоположении из своих твитов в любое время. Подробнее
(#6) So many of these graphs look the same that, without the title, it looks like I'm simply reposting a single chartpic.twitter.com/iEoKxpubi1
(#8) Some of these terms (such as the one below) turn up so many results that I had to limit the search to a single news sourcepic.twitter.com/zw08WqX2GI
#13 I was telling @rasmansa that I don't recall the term 'people of color' being used so frequently in previous years/decades. Maybe there's something to this...?pic.twitter.com/3TfNWzOM5P
#14: One important thing to keep in mind is that only results for articles which LexisNexis has inventorized are going to turn up. For instance, the trend below technically begins in the 1980s; but only a handful of articles that LexisNexis has for this period mentions 'racism'.pic.twitter.com/BkKyxberK7
Have a couple more I'm currently working on (including political correctness). Anybody have any other suggestions?
#17 'Unconscious bias' is more frequency referred to than 'implicit bias', but had to checkpic.twitter.com/TVTL3hu1nI
#18 During the 90s, the number of articles (at least on LexisNexis) mentioning 'political correctness' ranged from 4 (1990) to 380 (1990). 2007 was the first year this number entered into the 1000s (1056), which is where it's stayed since 2013.pic.twitter.com/UmEDEwPt4U
As some of you pointed out, any search term is likely to see an overtime increase (if only due to growth in the number of news outlets/publications). As such, I think it's better to limit the searches to single publications. So here's the trend for 'PC' in the NYTpic.twitter.com/GJhdpppi3T
And here's the number of NYT articles mentioning 'diversity'pic.twitter.com/4mjOOrcebK
Original NYT Racism graph was actually an undercount. The search was generated with racism in quotations (and quotations should only be used when connecting two words). Here's the corrected figure. Let me see if other graphs are similarly affected.pic.twitter.com/9C26W12ock
The 'privilege' NYT graph was also an undercount. Obviously, the word 'privilege' need not refer to social/racial privilege. I nevertheless find it interesting that its use has grown tremendously over the past few years. It could be just a coincidence, but I'm skeptical.pic.twitter.com/AilEduyvAZ
Update: Currently working on tallying the annual number of NYT articles between 1980-2018 so I can calculate percentages. The NYT doesn't make this information readily available so I have to 'cheat' by using noise words (e.g. 'the') as search terms.
Update #2: Okay, I've finished one of them. Once again, using 'the' as a search term, I tabulated the number of results for NYT each year between 1980-2018. In the end, it seems that 'racism' mentions grew both in absolute terms *and* as a percent of all listed articles.pic.twitter.com/alCo8bZaXP
For instance, for 2018, LexisNexis produces results for 113,596 articles--2.07% of which mentioned 'racism'
Вероятно, серверы Твиттера перегружены или в их работе произошел кратковременный сбой. Повторите попытку или посетите страницу Статус Твиттера, чтобы узнать более подробную информацию.
