Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
ZachG932's profile
Zach Goldberg
Zach Goldberg
Zach Goldberg
@ZachG932

Tweets

Zach Goldberg

@ZachG932

PhD student/Wokeness Studies scholar/@CSPICenterOrg fellow researching the 'Great Awokening'

Joined February 2014

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

      1/n Spent some time on LexisNexis over the weekend. Depending on your political orientation, what follows will either disturb or encourage you. But regardless of political orientation, I'm sure we can all say 'holy fucking shit'

      520 replies 2,811 retweets 6,196 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

      2/n Here's 'holy fucking shit' #1pic.twitter.com/KRVBl6ucIo

      118 replies 854 retweets 2,863 likes
      Show this thread
      Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

      #2pic.twitter.com/8mlMOGmKYe

      11:34 AM - 28 May 2019
      • 385 Retweets
      • 1,612 Likes
      • sir crankypants Michael Vrska kirito Vlad Punctilious_Kudu Sean P Nickerson spg10g Fink Postcards of the Hanging(s)
      17 replies 385 retweets 1,612 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

          #3pic.twitter.com/OxM8FJCZ3G

          10 replies 271 retweets 1,321 likes
          Show this thread
        3. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

          #4pic.twitter.com/k4oJhfa2aR

          13 replies 283 retweets 1,378 likes
          Show this thread
        4. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

          #5pic.twitter.com/ysaT8Tp7BM

          57 replies 511 retweets 2,095 likes
          Show this thread
        5. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

          (#6) So many of these graphs look the same that, without the title, it looks like I'm simply reposting a single chartpic.twitter.com/iEoKxpubi1

          17 replies 323 retweets 1,567 likes
          Show this thread
        6. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

          (#7) If you're looking for a job in a booming industry....pic.twitter.com/nERSV7N2eH

          17 replies 240 retweets 1,311 likes
          Show this thread
        7. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

          (#8) Some of these terms (such as the one below) turn up so many results that I had to limit the search to a single news sourcepic.twitter.com/zw08WqX2GI

          17 replies 227 retweets 1,183 likes
          Show this thread
        8. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

          (#9)pic.twitter.com/XgOAzYCO2u

          14 replies 203 retweets 1,085 likes
          Show this thread
        9. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

          (#10)pic.twitter.com/nVDNOR0eDY

          7 replies 195 retweets 1,046 likes
          Show this thread
        10. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

          #11pic.twitter.com/UiZ59GR9wp

          11 replies 169 retweets 948 likes
          Show this thread
        11. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

          #12pic.twitter.com/jL390W7jwh

          7 replies 141 retweets 888 likes
          Show this thread
        12. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

          #13 I was telling @rasmansa that I don't recall the term 'people of color' being used so frequently in previous years/decades. Maybe there's something to this...?pic.twitter.com/3TfNWzOM5P

          27 replies 225 retweets 1,128 likes
          Show this thread
        13. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

          #14: One important thing to keep in mind is that only results for articles which LexisNexis has inventorized are going to turn up. For instance, the trend below technically begins in the 1980s; but only a handful of articles that LexisNexis has for this period mentions 'racism'.pic.twitter.com/BkKyxberK7

          9 replies 159 retweets 867 likes
          Show this thread
        14. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

          #15: Clear Charlottesville effectpic.twitter.com/wi2nJoJXli

          9 replies 150 retweets 874 likes
          Show this thread
        15. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

          #16 Our future is intersectionalpic.twitter.com/YNWk8XZ8g5

          20 replies 161 retweets 889 likes
          Show this thread
        16. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

          Have a couple more I'm currently working on (including political correctness). Anybody have any other suggestions?

          143 replies 42 retweets 478 likes
          Show this thread
        17. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

          #17 'Unconscious bias' is more frequency referred to than 'implicit bias', but had to checkpic.twitter.com/TVTL3hu1nI

          10 replies 104 retweets 676 likes
          Show this thread
        18. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

          #18 During the 90s, the number of articles (at least on LexisNexis) mentioning 'political correctness' ranged from 4 (1990) to 380 (1990). 2007 was the first year this number entered into the 1000s (1056), which is where it's stayed since 2013.pic.twitter.com/UmEDEwPt4U

          9 replies 113 retweets 604 likes
          Show this thread
        19. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

          @C_Kavanagh You asked for RW-related terms. Here's one.

          8 replies 21 retweets 220 likes
          Show this thread
        20. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

          As some of you pointed out, any search term is likely to see an overtime increase (if only due to growth in the number of news outlets/publications). As such, I think it's better to limit the searches to single publications. So here's the trend for 'PC' in the NYTpic.twitter.com/GJhdpppi3T

          15 replies 94 retweets 538 likes
          Show this thread
        21. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

          And here's the number of NYT articles mentioning 'diversity'pic.twitter.com/4mjOOrcebK

          10 replies 104 retweets 564 likes
          Show this thread
        22. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

          Original NYT Racism graph was actually an undercount. The search was generated with racism in quotations (and quotations should only be used when connecting two words). Here's the corrected figure. Let me see if other graphs are similarly affected.pic.twitter.com/9C26W12ock

          16 replies 115 retweets 608 likes
          Show this thread
        23. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 28 May 2019

          The 'privilege' NYT graph was also an undercount. Obviously, the word 'privilege' need not refer to social/racial privilege. I nevertheless find it interesting that its use has grown tremendously over the past few years. It could be just a coincidence, but I'm skeptical.pic.twitter.com/AilEduyvAZ

          21 replies 79 retweets 477 likes
          Show this thread
        24. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 29 May 2019

          Update: Currently working on tallying the annual number of NYT articles between 1980-2018 so I can calculate percentages. The NYT doesn't make this information readily available so I have to 'cheat' by using noise words (e.g. 'the') as search terms.

          8 replies 28 retweets 302 likes
          Show this thread
        25. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 29 May 2019

          Update #2: Okay, I've finished one of them. Once again, using 'the' as a search term, I tabulated the number of results for NYT each year between 1980-2018. In the end, it seems that 'racism' mentions grew both in absolute terms *and* as a percent of all listed articles.pic.twitter.com/alCo8bZaXP

          28 replies 90 retweets 467 likes
          Show this thread
        26. Zach Goldberg‏ @ZachG932 29 May 2019

          For instance, for 2018, LexisNexis produces results for 113,596 articles--2.07% of which mentioned 'racism'

          60 replies 37 retweets 263 likes
          Show this thread
        27. End of conversation

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info