ShitMyReviewersSay

@YourPaperSucks

Collecting the finest real specimens of reviewer comments since 1456. Submit now!

Vrijeme pridruživanja: listopad 2014.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @YourPaperSucks

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @YourPaperSucks

  1. Prikvačeni tweet

    “I am afraid this manuscript may contribute not so much towards the field’s advancement as much as toward its eventual demise.”

    Poništi
  2. 1. velj

    Following you around like in a bad horror movie.

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    13. kol 2019.
    Poništi
  4. 30. sij

    "The arguments in the paper are compelling but not convincing"

    Poništi
  5. 30. sij

    "To improve this you need to be more robust on all fronts etc."

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    Journal: Ready to submit your manuscript? Me: Yup! (cracking my knuckles) Journal: Do you have all these ready? 1. Your login details 2. Your ORCID ID 3. Manuscript 4. Each image as separate file 5. Cover letter 6. COI for each author 7. Author signatures for all

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 27. sij

    “The proposal is also poorly written and unfocused with only brief moments of meritorious thinking.”

    Poništi
  8. 22. sij

    'What were you thinking?'

    Poništi
  9. 22. sij

    “The presentation is of a standard that I would reject from an undergraduate student”

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    13. sij

    Few people remember the decades long fight between Fisher and Neyman. This paper by Neyman (1961) funnily called 'The Silver Jubilee of My Dispute with Fisher', clearly shows scientists do not need Twitter to be mean to each other.

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    13. sij

    We thank the reviewers for their suggestions, which have vastly improved our manuscript

    Poništi
  12. 12. sij

    "The phrases I have so far avoided using in this review are 'lipstick on a pig' and 'bullshit baffles brains'"

    Poništi
  13. 12. sij

    "The authors last name sounds Spanish. I didn't read the manuscript because I'm sure it's full of bad English'

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Reviewer on my current manuscript: "I don’t see the point of this paper. The author seems to set up a straw man argument and then proceeds to knock it down."

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 10. sij

    ’…this is a antique approach to a modern problem’

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    9. sij

    Many thanks to the anonymous student who told me, on a course evaluation, "Your classroom charisma has all the captivating qualities of a house plant, which, I am certain, would teach this course in a more engaging manner if given the opportunity."

    Poništi
  17. 8. sij

    'Black-box modeling exercise using a hodge-podge of data tied together with a poorly-defined model'

    Poništi
  18. 7. sij

    "Statistical analysis. It is a bit strange for me that authors have used Python for statistical analysis instead of using SPSS or MATLAB as usual in the field. Please, explain."

    Poništi
  19. 6. sij

    "Starting from the title, the paper is a complete nonsense. […] . The paper is a long, verbose and unnecessary description of obvious or well-known stuff. […]. For the reasons above, rejecting the manuscript is a moral obligation."

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Recently had bad rejection. From editor (not reviewers): -I didn't include a figure (I did) -Title didn't matter, 'folks won't care' -Actual rant over using 2 words -Color figures cost $ you know -Research justification as interesting as # of blades of grass in their lawn

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    16. pro 2019.

    " After an interesting introduction, the reader is left bewildered, confused, and ultimately unsatisfied with the study."

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·