Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @YourPaperSucks
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @YourPaperSucks
-
Prikvačeni tweet
“I am afraid this manuscript may contribute not so much towards the field’s advancement as much as toward its eventual demise.”
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Following you around like in a bad horror movie.https://twitter.com/quantoid55/status/1223717647801634817 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
ShitMyReviewersSay proslijedio/la je TweetHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
"The arguments in the paper are compelling but not convincing"pic.twitter.com/oC2ich43Hc
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
"To improve this you need to be more robust on all fronts etc."pic.twitter.com/Xe7Zf1MRQx
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
ShitMyReviewersSay proslijedio/la je Tweet
Journal: Ready to submit your manuscript? Me: Yup! (cracking my knuckles) Journal: Do you have all these ready? 1. Your login details 2. Your ORCID ID 3. Manuscript 4. Each image as separate file 5. Cover letter 6. COI for each author 7. Author signatures for all
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
“The proposal is also poorly written and unfocused with only brief moments of meritorious thinking.”pic.twitter.com/c8Tg81njIT
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
“The presentation is of a standard that I would reject from an undergraduate student”pic.twitter.com/D3SFVPDmQk
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
ShitMyReviewersSay proslijedio/la je Tweet
Few people remember the decades long fight between Fisher and Neyman. This paper by Neyman (1961) funnily called 'The Silver Jubilee of My Dispute with Fisher', clearly shows scientists do not need Twitter to be mean to each other.pic.twitter.com/junduUhJrP
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
ShitMyReviewersSay proslijedio/la je Tweet
We thank the reviewers for their suggestions, which have vastly improved our manuscript
#AcademicTwitter@AcademicsSay@YourPaperSucks@thirdreviewerpic.twitter.com/iMJCZk9uXN
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
"The phrases I have so far avoided using in this review are 'lipstick on a pig' and 'bullshit baffles brains'"pic.twitter.com/nLviiyznX5
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
"The authors last name sounds Spanish. I didn't read the manuscript because I'm sure it's full of bad English'pic.twitter.com/uC98dMguYZ
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
ShitMyReviewersSay proslijedio/la je Tweet
Reviewer on my current manuscript: "I don’t see the point of this paper. The author seems to set up a straw man argument and then proceeds to knock it down."
@YourPaperSuckspic.twitter.com/DdVDZ7GKDUPrikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
’…this is a antique approach to a modern problem’pic.twitter.com/37zqDb4SbI
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
ShitMyReviewersSay proslijedio/la je Tweet
Many thanks to the anonymous student who told me, on a course evaluation, "Your classroom charisma has all the captivating qualities of a house plant, which, I am certain, would teach this course in a more engaging manner if given the opportunity."
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
'Black-box modeling exercise using a hodge-podge of data tied together with a poorly-defined model'pic.twitter.com/jLa6fqW126
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
"Statistical analysis. It is a bit strange for me that authors have used Python for statistical analysis instead of using SPSS or MATLAB as usual in the field. Please, explain."pic.twitter.com/pvqkM1nG8h
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
"Starting from the title, the paper is a complete nonsense. […] . The paper is a long, verbose and unnecessary description of obvious or well-known stuff. […]. For the reasons above, rejecting the manuscript is a moral obligation."pic.twitter.com/5cEiF3xCul
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
ShitMyReviewersSay proslijedio/la je Tweet
Recently had bad rejection. From editor (not reviewers): -I didn't include a figure (I did) -Title didn't matter, 'folks won't care' -Actual rant over using 2 words -Color figures cost $ you know -Research justification as interesting as # of blades of grass in their lawnhttps://twitter.com/TrevorABranch/status/1205207900219592704 …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
ShitMyReviewersSay proslijedio/la je Tweet
" After an interesting introduction, the reader is left bewildered, confused, and ultimately unsatisfied with the study."
@YourPaperSuckspic.twitter.com/IEtgFsuvScHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.