Conversation
Replying to
IT LOOKS WORSE THAN IT IS. YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND THAT AN ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE IS NOT EVIDENCE OF ABSENCE.
1
Replying to
Well, I kind of did trust you on this one. Do I have a reason not to? Because you're being Suspiciously Specific.
1
Replying to
FINE. THERE MIGHT BE A LETTER. BUT ITS CONTENTS DRAW A CONCLUSION FROM AN INADEQUATE DATA SET.
3
1
Replying to
I will treat it with the appropriate suspicion then. But to clarify, should I NOT use Layar, or "not" use Layar?
2