Most of C++ criticism is simply outdated. Polygeneric hyperfunctions, compile-time compilation, self-destroying constructors, std::textstring and many other features essentially make C++63 a new language. We should call it Novel C++ to clearly distinguish it from C++5x.
-
were i a bit serious, i think it's becoming legit to think of c++ as a giant toolbox you can pick only a subset of and be fine. Features are supposed to work for you not the other way around.
Does "you" refer to a set of like-minded coworkers? Or the coding rules cabal? Does it include external library writers? How would "you" exclude "their" favorite features from "your" C++ software?
-
-
i agree this is terribly difficult to implement within a company, the guidelines would be difficult to come up with and would probably be challenged on a daily basis
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.