Community-managed code is better because they can reject commits. Your company has a deadline? Tough - your patch still sucks. Fork the code or whatever, we don't give a shit. Can't do it in a proprietary setting.
Show this thread
By its nature, proprietary software is at a quality disadvantage compared to OSS - a rare counter-example is treating compiler warnings as errors, harder for OSS as it'd tie users to a very specific compiler version.
-
-
Is that (propriety lesser quality than OSS) empirically proven? My experience is different, and I can think of a few examples where it's wrong (e.g., google internal MR, or MapR vs hadoop)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Our OSS project supports multiple compilers in CI testing, and treats selected classes of warnings as errors. Works well.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.