Climate change is very real and very dangerous. It's key that we be precise about what awaits us. That makes this tweet remarkable: It basically amounts to a retraction of "The Uninhabitable Earth," the most-read article in the history of New York Magazine, by its own author.https://twitter.com/dwallacewells/status/1208127954968031232 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sure. But is inaccurate reporting on “worst case doom and gloom” v. “middle of the road bad” scenario really what’s driving inaction? This is such a sideshow.
-
“Hmm these models not showing at least a temporary dip below 400ppm really are operating on some untested assumptions. I’m going to err on the side of complete and total inaction.” - Fox News viewer in suburban Orlando evacuating the climate change reporting lol
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Going beyond the science" has worked really well for climate "sceptics"/deniers...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
By far the bigger risk is falling short of the science.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This story says that the unexpected drop in cost of renewables has lead to larger adoption than expected, which shifts where we end up with a "business as usual" approach, which goes from very very very very bad to very very very bad.
-
And the second half of the story goes on to detail that our best case scenarios are no longer realistic - too much damage has been and is being done already.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.