I think another conclusion (other than dishonesty) could be cherry-picking. That just requires you to ignore parts--as most Christians do.https://twitter.com/maajidnawaz/status/860473462191685632 …
-
-
Replying to @YasMohammedxx @ConfessionsExMu
Saying "dishonesty" can be insulting. Quilliam been at forefront defending ex-Muslims,if staff say something you don't like, arrange a chat
9 replies 2 retweets 8 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Ellifto2 @ConfessionsExMu
Otherwise, throwing words like "dishonesty" around can mean that this response is what we end up with. I'm sure you don't want this Yasmine
4 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @MaajidNawaz @Ellifto2
Of course not, but I cant control what ppl on twitter do-and I wont take responsibility for it. I look fwd to chat re 3 Quilliam ppl/the org
1 reply 3 retweets 8 likes -
Not my point. If my critique of something u said led to a Muslim labelling u a heretic, I'd jump in to defend you in solidarity against them
1 reply 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @MaajidNawaz @Ellifto2
My point was saying Mohammed was a pacifist is dishonest. Saying right wing terrorism >than Islamism. That's dishonest. I stand by that.
5 replies 14 retweets 43 likes -
"Dishonest" points to intent. This is simply an impossible thing to know rationally. And besides, his tweet didn't use the word pacifist.
4 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
Youre right; for brevity-I summarized to 'pacifist'. Youre also right, it's impossible to know intent-but rationally, both claims are untrue
-
-
Thank you. Yes, Muhammad was *not* a pacifist. Jihadism is still the biggest threat. And ascribing dishonesty to someone isn't rational x
6 replies 2 retweets 8 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
