I think another conclusion (other than dishonesty) could be cherry-picking. That just requires you to ignore parts--as most Christians do.https://twitter.com/maajidnawaz/status/860473462191685632 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Not my point. If my critique of something u said led to a Muslim labelling u a heretic, I'd jump in to defend you in solidarity against them
My point was saying Mohammed was a pacifist is dishonest. Saying right wing terrorism >than Islamism. That's dishonest. I stand by that.
-
-
Adam made claim that Muhammad would condemn terrorists, Islamists. Thats dishonest considering what we know of Muhammad, right
@MaajidNawaz? - 14 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
"Dishonest" points to intent. This is simply an impossible thing to know rationally. And besides, his tweet didn't use the word pacifist.
-
Youre right; for brevity-I summarized to 'pacifist'. Youre also right, it's impossible to know intent-but rationally, both claims are untrue
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
If not dishonest; profoundly naive. I don't think Mohammed was interested in pacifism.
-
Muhammad was a pacifist early in his career when he was under his uncle's protection and a tyrant when he had power & money in Medina.
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Hi Yasmine. Given that you seem interested in the truth above blind loyalty to any personality would you mind...1
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.