I think that's easier to do in Christianity,as the nasty bits of the NT were authored not by big boss Jesus but lesser authorities,e.g. Paul
-
-
Replying to @YayAnonymity @ConfessionsExMu
Discarding those would be like discarding certain Hadiths. But in Islam there is lots of nastiness in "untouchable" core texts.Won't be easy
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @YayAnonymity
I agree,but I still think it'll be easier to get ppl to ignore vs getting them to disregard 1400 yrs of scholars/research/laws as wrong info
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @YasMohammedxx @ConfessionsExMu
i agree too...but i think it'll be important to have a catchy way to justify ignoring it though, in a way that is intuitively consistent
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @YayAnonymity
Ya, as
@Hasdru_Baal pointed out..if it is about secularism or liberal values-that could be the guiding light1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Hasdru_Baal @YayAnonymity
Ya, it's about power. Theocracies won't give up their power willingly.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Sadly, preaching radicalization is a suitable tool by which certain individuals easily obtain power within religions (not just in Islam)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
They do, but they actually don't have much power at all. Their governments (which are absolute monarchies is KSA, Qatar, etc) control them
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
