I think another conclusion (other than dishonesty) could be cherry-picking. That just requires you to ignore parts--as most Christians do.https://twitter.com/maajidnawaz/status/860473462191685632 …
-
-
Replying to @YasMohammedxx @ConfessionsExMu
I think that's easier to do in Christianity,as the nasty bits of the NT were authored not by big boss Jesus but lesser authorities,e.g. Paul
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @YayAnonymity @ConfessionsExMu
Discarding those would be like discarding certain Hadiths. But in Islam there is lots of nastiness in "untouchable" core texts.Won't be easy
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @YayAnonymity
I agree,but I still think it'll be easier to get ppl to ignore vs getting them to disregard 1400 yrs of scholars/research/laws as wrong info
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @YasMohammedxx @ConfessionsExMu
i agree too...but i think it'll be important to have a catchy way to justify ignoring it though, in a way that is intuitively consistent
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @YayAnonymity
Ya, as
@Hasdru_Baal pointed out..if it is about secularism or liberal values-that could be the guiding light1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Ya, it's about power. Theocracies won't give up their power willingly.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
