You're right. But fundamentalists aren't going to buy the reform bs that Mo was a pacifist that would condemn ISIS either
I think another conclusion (other than dishonesty) could be cherry-picking. That just requires you to ignore parts--as most Christians do.https://twitter.com/maajidnawaz/status/860473462191685632 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lol...did you just liken me to porn??
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Im a fan of Maajid too--but that doesnt mean I wont call a spade a spade.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Well...let's just take a step back. You are comparing apples and compost right now. No. Quilliam stands for liberalism/Secularism not Sharia
-
Maajid and Sarsour are NOTHING alike. Criticize both if you like, but lumping them both as 'no different' is absurd. Do your hw on them.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Saying "dishonesty" can be insulting. Quilliam been at forefront defending ex-Muslims,if staff say something you don't like, arrange a chat
-
I sent a message to you a while back asking for a chat. I hope we can make it work.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Ya, those parts are definitely pits and not cherries :)
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.