Is it worth mentioning though? Is that really significant to you? You’re perfectly fine to continue to support an authoritarian regime that will imprison ppl for having sex outside of marriage....as long as you’re safe? Take a moment to think about how shitty this comment is.https://twitter.com/SebCostello9/status/1174816886015418373 …
-
-
Replying to @YasMohammedxx
I’m not sure how you get to me “supporting an authoritative regime” from this tweet. But cool. I work on a radio show where we discussed reports that this law might cover tourists. This tweet is a correction to that segment. It’s not a comment.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SebCostello9 @YasMohammedxx
Furthermore, the tourist angle is a distraction. The reason I put significant work into setting that aside as an issue is that it means that now more people can rightly focus on the serious human rights breaches that this law creates. That is important to me. Cheers
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Yes, I agree that it is an irrelevant distraction. Whether the law applies to ppl with white or brown skin, to Indonesians or Australians is irrelevant.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
