Someone from a minority group who chooses to serve in a far right government is no longer a person of colour. They’re a turncoat of colour. It’s one thing to opt out of fighting oppression, quite another to legitimise it with your own skin.
-
-
MLK’s ‘I have a Dream’: “....that one day my children will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the strength of their character...” The far-left is regressing 60 years back to a time when everyone was judged by their color or ethnicity (which a person can’t choose)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Beautifully said
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
such bigots who think only one thought is applicable in the world have adhered to extreme thinking rooted in abrahamic(faiths) supremacy. In many indigenous and polytheist and dharmic faiths/cultures, no single thought, and millions of thought processes welcome. NO SINGLE BOOK.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think it assumes that they lost their agency way before that in order to hold such views. Now they are in the public eye as aspirational minorities whilst not actually being a true representatives of their communities. 100% agree with you in sentiment though!
@AyoCaesarThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Logic wins again! It’s like ppl stop half way through thinking something through!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, because a far left government would not persecute White people.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
