Anything to own Trump, apparently
I don’t know why they had him on, and I don’t care. There is absolutely no reason ever to give this person a microphone.https://twitter.com/LibertarianBlue/status/1151266636508389377 …
Whoa! CNN just gave a platform to white nationalism!
Any comment, @mmfa, @splcenter, @ADL, @hopenothate, @RightWingWatch?? 
@Facebook, @Twitter, @YouTube, when does the CNN demonetization / deplatforming start? pic.twitter.com/6EezHtmUZw
pic.twitter.com/6EezHtmUZw-
-
-
They owned themselves. I watched the clip-Spencer was saying Trump’s tweets are just empty words and that he doesn’t follow through w action. They had him on to say Trump wasn’t racist enough. I don’t even know what’s happening anymore.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The worst part about this is they literally could have chosen some intellectual or legitimate political pundit on either side of the aisle instead. However, they chose to go with shock value for ratings. It's almost like corporate Media only cares about one thing: $$$
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Freedom of speech except when I don’t like it”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I just have to disagree. All the day time talk shows used to bring clan members on stage all the time. Howard Stern used to bring a clan member on to do movie reviews.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
People like him are obviously being used to discredit political opponents. I saw several interviews where Tulsi Gabbard was sought smeared by asking her about alleged endorsements from people like him.
-
If the endorsements are real, I wonder too if they weaponize their own endorsements. They must know that any public endorsement from them is an effective smear...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.