Interesting how being interviewed in Britain had such opposite effects on Shapiro and Peterson Peterson who is normally more emotional, was cool as a cucumber w Newman (who sucked) And Shapiro who is normally composed, got all emotional in this interview w Neil (who was great)
-
Shapiro the "master debater" can't handle being challenged by an intelligent man and professional like Andrew Neil. It's easier when you have to go against screaming college students. LOL
Ya, it’s hard to defend irrational, faith-based beliefs.
-
-
That's just simply not true. Ben doesn't just base his opposition to abortion on "irrational, faith-based beliefs" ... that's like saying that an atheist can't be pro-life - which is nonsense. And Ben can more than hold his own against any opponent in any situation.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
It’s easy to write things off as irrational when you present no facts to rebut any position. Ben never cites the Bible to talk about abortion. You don’t have to, because you can use science / reason to. Don’t kid yourself.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Exactly. But he should examine that and produce a reasoned argument for a faith-based idea
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.