How is this argument any different from white supremacists who are opposed to inter-racial marriage?https://twitter.com/rmolot/status/1119576688206196737 …
Show this thread
-
@YasMohammedxx You're spot on. It doesn't matter how this attitude was born, it's straight-up Jewish Supremacy. It's one thing to have a preference, which most cultures do, but to then not go to the wedding, shun the union, etc. is bigotry, period.
Have a personal preference, sure...of course! But the problem is when you expect everyone to have the same preferences as you and you hurt family members who do not abide by your preferences. This goes for a family member marrying a nonJew or a gay person. Just celebrate w them!
-
-
You're continuing to attack a strawman. Shapiro (who I do not like in most instances) never said that others should have the same preferences as himself. You're basically saying that the person you define as intolerant is under an obligation to appease others. That's wrong.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Furthermore, you're the one being intolerant when you say to a person who has a divergent view on a topic to "just celebrate with them." How intolerant would it be for a Muslim woman marrying a Christian to force her family to attend if they don't want to? Very intolerant.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Tolerance is a two-way street. In order to be tolerant, you need to allow others who you personally view as intolerant to express their actions as long as they are not causing harm. And forcing someone to attend an event that they are opposed to is extremely intolerant.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.