This is the kind of thoughtless take that is actively destroying our discourse. Be better.https://twitter.com/LibyaLiberty/status/1101810513019879424 …
-
-
Replying to @SarahTheHaider @ConfessionsExMu
I thought her point was well made and well illustrated. A little bit hyperbolic perhaps, but thoughtful; not just abusive. Be better.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @4inForty4Foto @ConfessionsExMu
Without citing the multiple clarifications she made hours later, what is the “well-made” point in this tweet?
1 reply 0 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @SarahTheHaider @ConfessionsExMu
That, as signified by the sports brand decision, when you deny people the right to wear what they please, you are not engaging with evil or bad ideaology, you are just denying people freedom. Hating the person, not the problem. How is do not wear x better than wear x or else?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @4inForty4Foto @ConfessionsExMu
She didn’t say that. If she had, I would have agreed with it.
1 reply 0 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @SarahTheHaider @ConfessionsExMu
It is how I interpreted it from the start. So it is exactly what I thought she said.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @4inForty4Foto @ConfessionsExMu
Okay, but she didn’t actually say that. I reacted to her literal words.
1 reply 0 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @SarahTheHaider @ConfessionsExMu
Meaning can be complex, I don't think 'literal' was an open interpetation but I could easily be wrong, that whole sign, signifier, signified stuff can get hard.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
How complex do you think ‘always always always’ is?
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes
I thought it was a recipe for corn chowder.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
