The Khashoggi case has tested our collective moral intuitions, and we have been found wanting. Saudi Arabia's abject human rights record, and the way it deals with dissenting voices have long been known. In fact, the same could be said for Iran, Russia and China.
-
Show this thread
-
Somehow, years of oppressing women, jailing and beheading regime critics and apostates of Islam, and even the atrocities of the Saudi-led bombings in Yemen haven't been good enough reason to express moral indignation, or even threaten Riyadh with sanctions and isolation.
5 replies 30 retweets 124 likesShow this thread -
There they are, inexplicably perched on the
@UN's Human Rights Council. Indeed, a story of a lone slain journalist is more dramatic than the vague idea of a school bus full of children being targeted by the Saudis. One murder is a story, the others, merely a statistic.4 replies 10 retweets 84 likesShow this thread -
All of this has triggered a huge paroxysm of media posturing & political rage. I'm not saying we should let this go, unquestioned. I'm just wondering why it took this case to do what should've done a long time ago. Why was
@raif_badawi, and everything else not enough?16 replies 13 retweets 104 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @MsMelChen @raif_badawi
Khashoggi was a US resident, so Americans feel like they have a right to speak up now. But when it’s Yemenis or Saudi women being persecuted, they ignore it as none of their business-because for yrs they’ve been told to ‘stay in their lane’. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes
That’s what happens if you make decisions based on pleasing a mob vs based on a set of values/ethics...or basic humanity.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
