Important thread on retribution and justice, and why “believe all women” is a dangerous mantra.https://twitter.com/keikoinboston/status/1042913577668096001 …
-
-
Replying to @HeatherEHeying @bendydebra
I don’t think the idea is to believe all women, full stop. It’s simply a first step. The idea is to believe, then do due diligence. The idea is to change the initial reaction from *not believe* to believe. Why assume she’s guilty of lying? What about her presumption of innocence?
17 replies 4 retweets 35 likes -
Replying to @YasMohammedxx @ConfessionsExMu and
The fallacy here is that there’s only 2 options when presented with an allegation 1. Believe it to be true instantly. 2. Believe it to be a lie instantly. The reality is serious allegations should be afforded serious investigation and it’s the investigation that determines 1 or 2
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Yes, you’re right. But the initial reaction/response has been to not believe women or to assume that they’re lying...this campaign is an effort to correct that so that both the accuser and the accused are presumed innocent.
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @YasMohammedxx @ConfessionsExMu and
Agree that the experiences of victims when coming forward has fallen below an acceptable standard for too long. Just worry that this new emphasis on ‘absolute and instant belief’ prior to investigation has the potential to influence investigations and jeopardise prosecutions.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
I don’t think anyone is suggesting that and even if some are (because of the fact that there is a judicial process) there’s no danger of that happening.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @YasMohammedxx @Olle7Ho and
I’ve shared before that I was one (of millions) of women who finally had the courage to tell only to be dismissed as a liar. Case closed. That’s a problem. As a society we need to believe women, and all victims, when they come forward. Then, of course, investigate.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @YasMohammedxx @ConfessionsExMu and
Again, totally agree that the way allegations have been handled in the past has failed genuine victims, but also struggle to see how police can presume the accused innocent whilst simultaneously being expected to presume them guilty by the accuser.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Olle7Ho @ConfessionsExMu and
I think we both agree that any accusation of this nature should warrant full and proper investigation and that there have been failings to do so in the past. I think the absolutism in the language used is what ‘muddys the water’ slightly, but in principle I’m in full agreement.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
‘Do not dismiss accusers as liars, assume they’re telling the truth until an investigation proves otherwise’ is not quite as catchy, but I think it’s the general ethos of the campaign. Or at least that’s how I understand it.
-
-
Replying to @YasMohammedxx @ConfessionsExMu and
Totally agree. It's a clumsy choice of words and poorly thought out.
#Checkforevidence0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
