But doesn’t banning it on principle set up a basis for banning other stuff too? Won’t people argue that the chandor or hijab makes it too hard to identify people and that they should then be banned on principle too?
-
-
Those again are clearer to me - people practicing things mostly on children that are clearly illegal for anyone to do of any faith. People without legal agency or the age to object. Again, this doesn’t feel the same because the women are adults.
-
The ppl in danger are ppl in the society. Forget religion. It’s unsafe to have members of your population walking around w their identity hidden. Security cameras, eye witnesses etc, all those are rendered obsolete. It’s prohibited for the safety of all. No one should be exempt.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Yes but those ‘divine laws’ are modelled from a ‘perfect’ man with a huge endorsement from a Supreme Being. How do you mess with perfection???
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
