« no one should be forced to wear it « - is it enough to SAY this? Will this guarantee women security and independence?
-
-
Replying to @ArsinoeV @MargaretAtwood and
Which is why I think it’s important to campaign and argue that it’s a bad thing. But I don’t think a ban is reasonable.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @tomcoates @MargaretAtwood and
«campaign and argue» AND a ban. ALL that helps those ill-treated women.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ArsinoeV @MargaretAtwood and
Limiting people’s honestly held political and religious expression which directly aims no one else seems dubious
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @NorthCaliGrl @ArsinoeV and
Tom Coates Retweeted Tom Coates
I don’t really know how to explain this to you but (1) I’m gay and (2) I explicitly said people should speak out and say something!https://twitter.com/tomcoates/status/1004069884731375616?s=21 …
Tom Coates added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tomcoates @NorthCaliGrl and
Seventeen retweets and 37 likes for a statement criticizing me - saying I should say precisely what I said. The only bit that seems insane is *banning* people from wearing clothes and following their religions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tomcoates @NorthCaliGrl and
I suspect that tweet above was to support your point, not counter it. At least that’s how I read it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @YasMohammedxx @ConfessionsExMu and
I don’t think it is, but just in case anyone is confused, I’ll restate my point - I don’t think it’s okay to ban anyone’s religious expression (unless it hurts someone else), and generally people should be free to worship how they wish or not at all.
10 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tomcoates @NorthCaliGrl and
I agree w you. I think your ‘unless it hurts someone else’ caveat is key when it comes to niqab. I wore it myself and I can tell you, it hurts the wearer first and foremost. Other than that, it’s as much a societal safety concern as a balaclava or anything else hiding identity.
1 reply 2 retweets 11 likes
I believe in one law for all. I don’t think there should be religious exclusions. If no one can walk into a bank or a school or an airport etc with their face covered...then no one can. No exceptions.
-
-
Replying to @YasMohammedxx @ConfessionsExMu and
I understand the rationale - I would argue that placing a barrier between someone’s actually held belief and their ability to function in the world could be highly counter-productive.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tomcoates @NorthCaliGrl and
There’s so much more than can be explained in a tweet. Did you watch the clip above? I try to explain it. Under fundamentalist Islam a women should not be seen, heard, or smelled by any man other than her husband. Banning it actually frees women from the obligation to wear it.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes - 20 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
