Caixin's reporting has been excellent and this story does make sense though the definition of informed might be subject to discussion
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Caixin's reporting has been excellent, but this claim seems suspect. If there's no H2H transmission, there's no epidemic nor threat of an epidemic. If that was the case, why did Xi need to get involved from January 7th to personally oversee affairs related to the epidemic?
-
caixin just a other propaganda agency. Rumor says early January there is a 内参 pass along in the party. They knew it all along,just waiting for words from Beijing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It mustn't be true. Li esd a veteran of President Xi's, she also claimed that the lockdown in Wuhan was her suggest at 22 January.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't trust nor believe anything in which any chin*se involved.
-
they did hide the H2H contact info just bcz they knew they woulda been isolated from the World. "If I'm burning, you're burning too." That's what they did!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's kind of at odds with the central database being taken down. Unfortunately this seems more like a coordinated effort to prevent panic and prepare for a lockdown once 春运 has finished.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You believe it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
现在的结果告诉人们:在疫情之初,北京方面敢于积极面对且果断决策及行动,这是非常值得欣赏的,相比于二战时的罗斯福、丘吉尔政府也不过如此。
-
需要补充一下的是,并不是说湖北、武汉就是病毒发源地,但是特殊时期必须要这样进行人事调动,因为这事涉及全球的福祉,您能理解吧?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.