@Wowhead @WatcherDev As interesting as that thought process is, it really feels senseless given that thought isn't put into class designs.
-
-
-
@Wowhead@WatcherDev Great to add meaning to things like that, but we constantly get told "gameplay first" by Blizzard... - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@Wowhead@WatcherDev "The effect isn't fair/balanced and is worse for <my spec> than <other specs>" -
@Wowhead@WatcherDev slight HTML issue there - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@Wowhead@WatcherDev right ok so you want unity with rings and yet you clearly created class stacking and left people out... No words...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Wowhead@WatcherDev " rings tend to be paired with counterparts" Except, you know, THE ONE RING. -
@Anshlun@Wowhead@WatcherDev No, I think what he means is since everyone will have one we're all getting Guild Married.#ido
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Wowhead@WatcherDev the fact that they lost 3 mil subs this soon again should tell them something.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Wowhead@WatcherDev I can dig it. Plus having designated 'ringmasters' each role will be new wrinkle to raid dynamics.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Wowhead@WatcherDev because people care about the lore behind the ring.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
