Weird change, but weirder to not take the opportunity to move the potency conduits to the neutral slots.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It seems like some of the comparison images you included don't match what is showing up in the beta. So far, Pelagos and Marileth are incorrect.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it's annoying that the potency conduits are often times in a fork. assuming players will always take the potency conduits since they're seemingly the most important nodes to get, it just means the cool, flavorful utility nodes aren't really a choice anymore.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't mind them tuning stuff, but doing too much may ruin the appeal for this expansion and classes. They need to calm down a bit
@WarcraftDevs. Balancing is one thing, but don't go heavy on it because you may end up hurting a class that was doing well and now is performs less.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I feel like this is a quality change. Makes the transition from spec changes within a class far less min/max. You can swap sub/sin/outlaw rogue without the fear of drastic DPS loss or gain prioritization.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So instead of fixing what's wrong with the system, now they're squishing it so people don't need as many "rerolls" for the conduits...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
