“Police said the suspect, a 45-year-old San Francisco resident, was on parole for robbery and was driving a vehicle that had been reported stolen at about 4 p.m. ...” Did you miss this part of the story @MattHaneySF?https://www.sfchronicle.com/crime/article/Two-pedestrians-killed-in-hit-and-run-in-S-F-s-15839481.php …
-
-
Replying to @TheMarinaTimes
No I did not.--I said immediately and many times that this was a crime, he should be held accountable, and I'm grateful to the officers who quickly apprehended them. I was in touch with fire and police immediately after it happened.
33 replies 1 retweet 36 likes -
Replying to @MattHaneySF @TheMarinaTimes
Had this perp been held accountable for any of his 5 previous crimes in 2020 he wouldn't have been out to commit more. Shame on
@chesaboudin and his supporters.5 replies 1 retweet 39 likes -
Replying to @WillyNaakt @MattHaneySF and
He was held accountable for his 2015 robbery. Sentenced to 5 years prison and released to parole. A lot of good that did.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @longo415 @MattHaneySF and
Lol, he was arrested 5 times on parole and could have been charged and re-incarcerated, but wasn't. Sometimes you need to keep people in jail to prevent them from committing additional crimes, and homicides.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @WillyNaakt @MattHaneySF and
Why lol? DA’s can’t file parole violations. Only CDCR can do that (PC 3000.08). So if anyone failed you it’s CDCR, not Boudin. But you won’t call that out. Doesn’t fit your narrative.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @longo415 @MattHaneySF and
@chesaboudin missed 5 chances to re-incarcerate this prep by imprisoning him for the *new* crimes. That's what you get when the DA under-prosecutes and doesn't believe in prison.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @WillyNaakt @MattHaneySF and
Again, the DA lacks power to file parole violations. So why aren’t you tweeting CDCR, the supervising agency with jurisdiction? Some see two innocent victims as a way to throw local political jabs but it really just exposes the California corrections machine as the true culprit.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @longo415 @MattHaneySF and
Because: 1) Chesa cut the deal that would get McAllister out on parole last April, and 2) There was nothing stopping Chesa from charging McAllister when he reoffended. Five times. Odd that you want parole to re-incarcerate McAllister for new crimes that Chesa won't prosecute.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @WillyNaakt @MattHaneySF and
Nothing stops a DA but the requirement to prove each element by proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
So you want parole to put an innocent man back in jail?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.