So the fuck what. Basically all political content gets "demonetized."
Crowder's revenue stream isn't from YouTube ads. It's from selling merch and "Socialism Is For Fags" shirts to millions of loyal customers, that @YouTube continues to drive to his channel. For free.https://twitter.com/TeamYouTube/status/1136341801109843968 …
-
Show this thread
-
To clarify, in order to reinstate monetization on this channel, he will need to remove the link to his T-shirts.
2,444 replies 88 retweets 904 likes -
So, uh, was it a pattern of egregious actions, or just the link to his t-shirts?pic.twitter.com/lGpdl117Rv
25 replies 172 retweets 3,950 likes -
Replying to @drmistercody @TeamYouTube and
BOTH AND NEITHER! NEXT QUESTION. MOVING ON. DONT MIND THAT BURNING SMELL. EVERYTHING IS FINE.
60 replies 166 retweets 5,084 likes -
Replying to @PhillyD @drmistercody and
I'm sure Philly D will "Both Sides" this like he does everything involving Right Wingers.
17 replies 5 retweets 456 likes -
Replying to @HandOfPanCocks @PhillyD and
He doesn't both sides things. He usually just doesn't give his opinion cause he's just there to give the facts and when he does give his opinion it's very brief. He's not trying to be a commentary channel. he's trying to provide the facts in an easily consumable format
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @deveyel @HandOfPanCocks and
He provides facts then "passes off" drawing conclusions on those facts to his audience, letting the uninformed individual decide what the truth is. He never draws a conclusion from the acts unless it's something unambiguous like child abuse.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @WilliamPecota @HandOfPanCocks and
He provides facts then let's the uninformed individual decide what the truth is? If he's providing the facts then they are no longer uninformed individuals and I think it makes sense for a news channel trying to rid bias to leave it to the individual to make their own conclusions
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @deveyel @HandOfPanCocks and
Assuming that you're completely informed and that your conclusions are the result of being completely informed just because you watched his show is the entire grift behind what he's trying to sell. Usually he says just enough to let people confirm their own biases.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @WilliamPecota @deveyel and
It's how he retains his audience, very rarely saying anything to alienate anyone and trying to create impartiality where it doesn't exist. Trying to frame an issue as "both sides are equal" is false equivalence. It ignores that sometimes one side is actually correct.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
His entire shtick that made him successful was as a commentary channel. It's only since trying to launch his news network that he's gone for this fake sense of impartiality, like saying he doesn't want to tell people who to vote for, then telling people to check out Gary Johnson.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.