Some good aspects in the report, but unfortunately leading to a highly misleading headline. The skin protecting the body against radio freqs? It s a little more complex than that. https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.128102 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Without any mention of
@IARCWHO or the other groups studying cellphone radiation, this article seems biased.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There is analogous fear and misinformation about low-level ionizing radiation. The "established" authorities (ICRP, EPA, etc) all use the precautionary principle instead of science -- radiation below 100 mSv is harmless. The fear keeps nuclear power from checking global warming.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even the CTIA says 5G will use multiple frequencies https://api.ctia.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Spectrum-Considerations-for-5G.pdf …pic.twitter.com/nIOBKzeMF1
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No science from a science writer. Assuring. NYT has a 5G partnership with Verizon so there's no bias of course. People need to do their own homework, get there head up from their phones, and think critically for once.
#sheepgetchronicdiseaseThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Re: roots of 5G fear. Root cause story contains many elements like those that resulted in an elevated world-wide fear of ionizing radiation. Contrary to parenthetical statement in your piece, X-rays do not cause negative health effects until they exceed threshold doses.
-
One of the major differences in the story line, however, is the background presence of a deep-pocketed funding source with impressive capacity for molding public opinion and a clear financial motive for creating more fear than warranted by facts.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@verizon is installing#5G in my neighborhood. Hundreds of new cell antennas being installed right outside our windows. My family has already been harmed by two antennas outside our home. Other members of my community have had similar experiences.#followhttp://chng.it/RzXZgRptThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"What began as a simple graph became a case study in how bad science can take root and flourish." What began as a simple article became a case study in how biased journalism can take truth and distort it. Read the science.
@saferphones https://ehtrust.org/key-issues/cell-phoneswireless/5g-internet-everything/20-quick-facts-what-you-need-to-know-about-5g-wireless-and-small-cells/ …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"At higher radio frequencies, the skin acts as a barrier, shielding the internal organs, including the brain, from exposure." The
@nytimes must have confused humans with comic book superheroes.pic.twitter.com/ztf7WG2T5I
-
ultraviolet behave the same way on skin but instead, it gives cancer, so what it will be for
#5G ? no one knows because there's no research at all on those "highter frequencies".#weareguineapigfor5G - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.