The WSJ editorial page applies its standards with unfailing consistency. As we saw in 2001 https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB978656661464759391 …pic.twitter.com/Tklhg2NVot
U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
The WSJ editorial page applies its standards with unfailing consistency. As we saw in 2001 https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB978656661464759391 …pic.twitter.com/Tklhg2NVot
Just canceled my subscription.
Did that months ago, having had my fill of the Murdoch editorial page, regretful that I’d miss the solid reporting on the news pages.
L'état, c'est moi.
They also praised Bolsonaro.
There are so many good journalists at @WSJ, but @WSJopinion drove me to cancel my subscription a while back with multiple gaslighting pieces defending Scott Pruitt, and claiming he was the *victim* of the swamp. Why would anyone pay for this drivel?https://www.wsj.com/articles/pruitt-drowns-in-the-swamp-1530834262 …
Every person who has ever run for office equates their election with the public interest. Whether it’s President of the 6th grade, President of a Union, or President of the US. Problem is...when self-interest “trumps” the public’s best interests.
More like fascism + terrorism + mass murder + puppy genocide + Armageddon x 4,000 + infinity bad stuff
I'm sure Hitler felt as though he was acting in Germany's best interest.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.