curious what folks who are into information sciences, ethics, misinfo, etc think about this approach (original paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2105.02274.pdf …)https://twitter.com/techreview/status/1395344762530631688 …
Show this thread
-
-
yes you’re right I have no idea why this is bad but I would love for you to point me in the right direction if you don’t mind
-
outside of the glib answer, three biggies: 1) large language models inherit massive biases that become more evident when generating text 2) affirms a notion of truth 3) puts onus on underlying sites for their content to be randomly sampled out of context. See Wikipedia x youtube
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.